Consulting Consultants IT Consulting
Search 180systems.com       
News Letter Signup
Home
About Us
Our People
Business Consultants
References
Clients
Services
System Selection
Business Process Review
Corporate Diagnostic
Business Case
IT Audit
HR Management
IT Infrastructure
Strategic Planning
IT Project Management
Technology White Papers
Technology Seminars
News & Articles
180 Blog
ERP Systems1
BI2
PSA3
CRM4
SCM5
BPR6
Business Case
Sarbanes-Oxley
IT Strategy
IT Project Management
Office Productivity
Internet
IT Marketing
IT Security
IT Humour
Buyers Guide
Software Selection
Business Case
Total Cost of Ownership
Software Implementation
Accounting Software
Distribution Software
Manufacturing Software
BI2
PSA3
CRM4
Resellers
Software Reviews
ERP Comparison1
ERP Reviews1
ERP Customer Survey1
BI Comparison2
BI Reviews2
PSA Comparison3
CRM Comparison4
Case Studies
Accounting Systems
Manufacturing Software
PSA3
CRM4
White Papers
ERP1
CPM7
What's New
Articles
Events
Contact Us
Office
Careers
Site Map

Business Technology

Monday, November 06, 2006

Multilateral Instrument 52-109 and Bill 198

October 17, 2006 from Horwath Orenstein LLP – “In a noteworthy development, separate statements of claim have recently been filed by Marvin Neil Silver and Cliff Cohen, both would-be plaintiffs in a proposed class action against Imax Corporation and certain directors and officers of the company. Silver’s claim is the first (by a day – Cohen’s followed hard on its heels) to invoke the secondary- market liability provisions that were recently added to the Securities Act (Ontario) under Bill 198...

Multilateral Instrument 52-109 and proposed amendments setting out reporting criteria required for 2006, 2007, and beyond, combined with Bill 198, has significant implications for Audit Committees, Directors and senior management of reporting issuers. The intent of these new rules and regulations is to improve governance and rebuild corporate credibility through accurate, reliable, and timely communication of information to shareholders. The announcement of the above class action is evidence that Bill 198 is a reality, and public issuers must ensure that they have exercised due diligence with respect to the company’s “Disclosure Controls and Procedures” and “Internal Controls over Financial Reporting”, under the certification requirements of Multilateral Instrument 52-109.

Multilateral Instrument 52-109 requires CEOs and CFOs of all Canadian publicly listed companies to certify:
a) The design and implementation of “Disclosure Controls and Procedures” for both interim and annual filings on or after March 31, 2005
b) The design and implementation of “Internal Control over Financial Reporting” for both interim and annual filings on or after June 30, 2006 (subject to transitional rules)
c) The evaluation of the effectiveness of “Disclosure Controls and Procedures” and have concluded on their effectiveness in the Management Discussion and Analysis accompanying their annual report for year ends ending on or after March 31, 2005
d) The disclosure of material changes in the “Internal Control over Financial Reporting” that occurred during the most recent interim period in the Management Discussion and Analysis accompanying their interim or annual report for periods ending on or after June 30, 2006

In addition, for years ending on or after December 31, 2007, CEOs and CFOs are required to certify on the evaluation of “Internal Controls over Financial Reporting”, and provide their conclusions on their effectiveness, including a discussion on the method for evaluating their effectiveness in the Management Discussion and Analysis accompanying the annual report...”

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

 

 
1enterprise resource planning | 2business intelligence | 3professional services automation
4customer relationship management | 5supply chain management | 6business process re-engineering
  © 2004 One Hundred & Eighty Degrees Systems Limited. All Rights Reserved
Web Site optimized by Toronto Search Engine Optimization | resources