Consulting Consultants IT Consulting
Search 180systems.com       
News Letter Signup
Home
About Us
Our People
Business Consultants
References
Clients
Services
System Selection
Business Process Review
Corporate Diagnostic
Business Case
IT Audit
HR Management
IT Infrastructure
Strategic Planning
IT Project Management
Technology White Papers
Technology Seminars
News & Articles
180 Blog
ERP Systems1
BI2
PSA3
CRM4
SCM5
BPR6
Business Case
Sarbanes-Oxley
IT Strategy
IT Project Management
Office Productivity
Internet
IT Marketing
IT Security
IT Humour
Buyers Guide
Software Selection
Business Case
Total Cost of Ownership
Software Implementation
Accounting Software
Distribution Software
Manufacturing Software
BI2
PSA3
CRM4
Resellers
Software Reviews
ERP Comparison1
ERP Reviews1
ERP Customer Survey1
BI Comparison2
BI Reviews2
PSA Comparison3
CRM Comparison4
Case Studies
Accounting Systems
Manufacturing Software
PSA3
CRM4
White Papers
ERP1
CPM7
What's New
Articles
Events
Contact Us
Office
Careers
Site Map

Business Technology

Monday, February 04, 2008

The Politics of Portfolio Management: Why It’s Harder Than It Looks

January 21, 2008 from gannthead.com and written by Mark Mullaly, PMP – “Portfolio management is one of the concepts that, on the face of it, organizations should naturally want to embrace. Most executives and project managers alike will acknowledge with little prompting that many of their challenges go beyond just the project level. Competition for resources and funding, too much work underway and pressure to address both operational and project responsibilities all speak to the need to make more effective project choices. Once this need is recognized, the concept of portfolio management quickly emerges as a logical direction to explore.

The principles of portfolio management are extremely straightforward. At its core essence, portfolio management addresses three fundamental questions:

  • Are we doing the right projects?
  • For the projects that we have chosen to undertake, are we confident that the projects are being delivered well and meet their goals?
  • For the projects that we have completed, are we consciously changing how the organization operates in order to realize the value we expected?

While these are entirely reasonable questions, and relatively simple ones to ask, the answers are more complex and involved. How do we know we are doing the right projects? What criteria do we apply? What judgments do we make? Right projects as compared to what?"

...Attempting to introduce portfolio management without acknowledging the politics of the organization is foolhardy” And he goes on to say “For the profit centers, however, any attempt to introduce a more objective level of scrutiny is going to be regarded as a significant threat to the status quo. For the profit centers of the world, they already have a positive level of influence in determining what projects proceed. More importantly, they are able to ensure that it is their projects that are the ones that do go ahead.”

180 View – People who belong to a profit centre will resist the imposition of change from head office or the project management office if it diminishes their control or could negatively impact their success. Even if the change is for the good of the company as a whole, the change will be resisted. You will need to change the organizational structure or the motivation/compensation if you want the profit centres to sign up.

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

 

 
1enterprise resource planning | 2business intelligence | 3professional services automation
4customer relationship management | 5supply chain management | 6business process re-engineering
  © 2004 One Hundred & Eighty Degrees Systems Limited. All Rights Reserved
Web Site optimized by Toronto Search Engine Optimization | resources