Consulting Consultants IT Consulting
Search 180systems.com       
News Letter Signup
Home
About Us
Our People
Business Consultants
References
Clients
Services
System Selection
Business Process Review
Corporate Diagnostic
Business Case
IT Audit
HR Management
IT Infrastructure
Strategic Planning
IT Project Management
Technology White Papers
Technology Seminars
News & Articles
180 Blog
ERP Systems1
BI2
PSA3
CRM4
SCM5
BPR6
Business Case
Sarbanes-Oxley
IT Strategy
IT Project Management
Office Productivity
Internet
IT Marketing
IT Security
IT Humour
Buyers Guide
Software Selection
Business Case
Total Cost of Ownership
Software Implementation
Accounting Software
Distribution Software
Manufacturing Software
BI2
PSA3
CRM4
Resellers
Software Reviews
ERP Comparison1
ERP Reviews1
ERP Customer Survey1
BI Comparison2
BI Reviews2
PSA Comparison3
CRM Comparison4
Case Studies
Accounting Systems
Manufacturing Software
PSA3
CRM4
White Papers
ERP1
CPM7
What's New
Articles
Events
Contact Us
Office
Careers
Site Map

Business Technology

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

Leading waste hauler sues SAP claiming ERP rollout a 'complete failure'

March 27, 2008 from ITBusiness.ca – “The trash disposal giant, Waste Management is suing SAP over an ERP implementation it dubs "a complete failure." In its court complaint, Waste Management said senior SAP executives, including SAP Americas' president and CEO, Bill McDermott, participated in the "rigged and manipulated" demos.”

180 View – It’s hard to believe that SAP would intentionally rig or manipulate a demo. A canned demo is apparent if you are asking questions. The demonstrator will be unable to show anything other than what was planned. It’s also unlikely that SAP would have answered specific functionality questions dishonestly. That would be a big problem in court. It would also be a big problem during the selection process if the truth was uncovered as the decision is largely based on trust. But perhaps the requirements were not well defined. And perhaps SAP was not forced to be specific in responding to requirements. A “Yes” can mean many things including out of the box functionality, third party, customization or workaround.

It’s not to say that the vendors are always blameless. We have recently heard a number of horror stories of failed implementations. In these cases, the problem lay with the Value Added Reseller who promised the world and failed to deliver. One question raised by these failures is to what extent the developer should be responsible for the failures of their Value Added Resellers. Many of the developers have certification processes, but it’s no guaranty. We would like to hear your thoughts on this.

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

 

 
1enterprise resource planning | 2business intelligence | 3professional services automation
4customer relationship management | 5supply chain management | 6business process re-engineering
  © 2004 One Hundred & Eighty Degrees Systems Limited. All Rights Reserved
Web Site optimized by Toronto Search Engine Optimization | resources