180 Systems_APIs vs. File Transfers A Brief Comparison

APIs vs. File Transfers: A Brief Comparison

In the world of data exchange between systems, two common methods stand out: Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) and file transfers. Each has distinct use cases, advantages, and limitations, making them suitable for different scenarios depending on the needs of the system or organization.

What is an API?

An API is a set of rules that allows software applications to communicate with each other in real time. They are ideal for real-time, interactive data sharing and are commonly used in web applications, mobile apps, and cloud services.

Pros of APIs:

  • Real-time data access
  • Can apply business logic in importing data
  • Better error handling and monitoring

Cons of APIs:

  • Requires programming knowledge to implement
  • Dependent on uptime and reliability of both systems
  • Not always available
  • They will be more expensive to implement

What is File Transfer?

File transfer typically involves moving structured files (like CSV, Excel, or XML) from one system to another. This method is common in legacy systems, batch processes, or when large volumes of data need to be shared periodically.

Pros of File Transfers:

  • Simple to implement, especially for large data sets
  • Good for batch processing
  • More universally supported across older systems

Cons of File Transfers:

  • Not real-time—data may be outdated by the time it’s used
  • Harder to track and secure without additional systems
  • Prone to issues if file structures change
  • Not applying business logic to validate data

What should be used when integrating an ERP system to existing applications?

APIs are generally more suitable for modern, real-time integrations, while file transfers are better for periodic, bulk data importing. But like most decisions, cost will be a factor and there may not be business case to invest in an API. However, don’t choose a phased approach with file transfers for phase 1 and API’s for phase 2. You could be very surprised and upset with the costs of phase 2 integration.

Michael Burns

Written by Michael Burns

Michael Burns is both founder and president of 180 Systems. Michael has provided consulting services to a wide variety of industries including manufacturing, construction, financial, distribution, retail, third-party logistics, professional services, real estate and not-for-profit organizations. Michael is a Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA) and is certified as a PMP (Project Manager Professional) and as a Certified Information Technology Professional (CITP).

Michael has written extensively for a number of professional magazines and spoken at IT conferences. He was also a part-time professor at University of Toronto and Toronto Metropolitan University (formerly Ryerson). Michael’s experience also includes software development, project management and accounting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *